Supreme Court Grants Corporations More Power

Posted on by

NATION-The US Supreme Court’s conservative majority continued its project of bartering off American democracy to the highest bidder with a decision Monday that will make it dramatically harder to counter free-spending attack campaigns funded by billionaire donors and corporate spin machines.

With a 5-4 vote, the Court has struck down a matching-funds mechanism in Arizona’s Clean Elections Law that allowed candidates who accepted public funding to match the spending of privately funded candidates and independent groups that might attack them. Under the Arizona law—which has long been considered a national model for using public funds to pay for campaigns—candidates who accept public funding are limited in what they can spend.

Candidates who refuse public funding are not so constrained; and nor are independent groups that support privately funded candidates; indeed, in the aftermath of the Supreme Court’s sweeping Citizens United v. FEC ruling of 2010, which cleared the way for corporations to spend as much as they like to influence election, restrictions to the flow of private money into politics have been all but eliminated.

Read full article about Supreme Court Removes Another Barrier To Corporate Ownership Of Elections.

© 2011 The Nation

Photo by Flickr user dbking

2 thoughts on “Supreme Court Grants Corporations More Power

  1. a provincial Supreme Court judge to me, my cinlet, back in the early 80s, something like:- Of course the law is fair and equitable. Of course the division of assets is based on 50/50. But it depends on the meaning of 50/50. -Like “it depends on the meaning of ‘is’”, if you can catch the meaning of that meaning as your jaw drops. Not in expectation.We’re in an age where not only our words are being redefined. Our phrases, our idioms, our sentences, our stories, our traditions are under attack.Not Me9tis enough, not multicultural enough. We’re never “enough”. Because judges, and the rest, are not man enough.No balls left means the game is over…

  2. Corporate Personhood is has been twisted into a Machiavellian plutocracy. Our Founding Father Thomas Jefferson wanted to prevent “monopolies in commerce.”

Leave a Reply

RELATED NEWS

  • Activism: A Scientific Certainty
  • MR Poetry – ‘Cut the Apron Strings’ & ‘Island’
  • MR Original – Obama’s War on Whistleblowers
  • MR Original – Obama Evokes State Secrets as Much as Bush
  • POLITICAL CORRUPTION

  • Media Roots Radio – The 9/11 Bulletin, Interview with Jon Gold
  • What If Edward Snowden Leaked All the Documents?
  • Oakland’s Anti-Spy Center Campaign Sets Template For US Cities
  • NSA Veterans Expose Shocking History of US Illegal Surveillance Program
  • American Drug War Creator on Addiction, Prohibition & the “Green Rush”
  • And to The Oligarchy, for Which it Stands
  • PBS Frontline Documentary: United States of Secrets
  • Media Roots Radio – Snowden, Greenwald, Wikileaks & the NSA
  • Glenn Greenwald’s Chutzpah
  • The Next Four Months Will Determine the Future of the Internet
  • FBI Agent Who Executed Ibragim Todashev is a Corrupt Ex-Oakland Cop
  • Chris Hedges: The Collapse of Industrial Civilization & the Antidote to Defeatism
  • From Squawk Box to CSPAN – Cutting Through the Beltway Bubble & Democracy Gap
  • MR Documentary – American Anthrax
  • The Ongoing, Never-Ending JFK Mythology