The Meaninglessness of “Terrorism”

Posted on by

SALON- For much of the day yesterday, the featured headline on The New York Times online front page strongly suggested that Muslims were responsible for the attacks on Oslo; that led to definitive statements on the BBC and elsewhere that Muslims were the culprits.  The Washington Post‘s Jennifer Rubin wrote a whole column based on the assertion that Muslims were responsible, one that, as James Fallows notes, remains at the Post with no corrections or updates.  The morning statement issued by President Obama — “It’s a reminder that the entire international community holds a stake in preventing this kind of terror from occurring” and “we have to work cooperatively together both on intelligence and in terms of prevention of these kinds of horrible attacks” — appeared to assume, though (to its credit) did not overtly state, that the perpetrator was an international terrorist group. 

But now it turns out that the alleged perpetrator wasn’t from an international Muslim extremist group at all, but was rather a right-wing Norwegian nationalist with a history of anti-Muslim commentary and an affection for Muslim-hating blogs such as Pam Geller’s Atlas Shrugged, Daniel Pipes, and Robert Spencer’s Jihad Watch.  Despite that, The New York Times is still working hard to pin some form of blame, even ultimate blame, on Muslim radicals (h/t sysprog):

Terrorism specialists said that even if the authorities ultimately ruled out Islamic terrorism as the cause of Friday’s assaults, other kinds of groups or individuals were mimicking Al Qaeda’s brutality and multiple attacks.

“If it does turn out to be someone with more political motivations, it shows these groups are learning from what they see from Al Qaeda,” said Brian Fishman, a counterterrorism researcher at the New America Foundation in Washington.

Al Qaeda is always to blame, even when it isn’t, even when it’s allegedly the work of a Nordic, Muslim-hating, right-wing European nationalist.  Of course, before Al Qaeda, nobody ever thought to detonate bombs in government buildings or go on indiscriminate, politically motivated shooting rampages.  The NYT speculates that amonium nitrate fertilizer may have been used to make the bomb because the suspect, Anders Behring Breivik, owned a farming-related business and thus could have access to that material; of course nobody would have ever thought of using that substance to make a massive bomb had it not been for Al Qaeda.  So all this proves once again what a menacing threat radical Islam is.

Read full article on Greenwald: The Meaninglessness of “Terrorism”.

Written by Glenn Greenwald

© Salon 2011




Leave a Reply

RELATED NEWS

  • Activism: A Scientific Certainty
  • MR Poetry – ‘Cut the Apron Strings’ & ‘Island’
  • MR Original – Obama’s War on Whistleblowers
  • MR Original – Obama Evokes State Secrets as Much as Bush
  • WORLD NEWS

  • Bhutan’s Missing Pillar of Happiness: The Truth
  • How Neoliberalism and NGOs Stunt Civil Society: Reflections on Palestine
  • Jeremy Scahill Talks About “Dirty Wars”
  • Breaking the Myths about Hugo Chavez
  • MR Original – The Times’ Operations
  • Israel Launches Aggressive Attack In Gaza
  • NYPD: A Homegrown Terrorist Cell
  • No Easy Truth: Continuous Casualty of Conflict
  • Keiser: Global Economic Collapse by 2013?
  • The Real Global 1% Ruling Class
  • MR Original – Part Two The Iranian Neighborhood
  • Bride Kidnappings in Half of all Kyrgyzstan Weddings
  • MR Original – From Persia To Iran
  • How the Times of India Colluded With Monsanto
  • Glenn Greenwald on Attacks Against RT & Assange